CFR 2018: The Year in Events

In 2018, CFR once again hosted high-level discussions of global affairs, from U.S. election security to the Iran-Saudi Arabia rivalry to the artificial intelligence race.

Article by Gabrielle Sierra, Author

November 26, 2018 2:44 pm (EST)

Article: Current political and economic issues succinctly explained.

Each year the Council on Foreign Relations convenes dozens of on-the-record events in which senior politicians, business executives, journalists, authors, and other top influencers discuss the most pressing global challenges of the day.

Russia and the 2016 U.S. Election: Joe Biden

The Future of Global Growth: Jim Yong Kim

On February 23, Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank Group, discussed strategies for promoting sustainable, inclusive economic growth with presider Alan S. Blinder, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University.

In this clip, Kim discusses why health and education matter for economic growth. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

Venezuela: What to Do About the Crisis

On April 4, CFR hosted a panel on Venezuela as part of its “What to Do About . . .” series. CFR’s Shannon K. O’Neil and Brad W. Setser, along with former U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela William Brownfield, spoke about the unprecedented economic and political crisis unfolding in the country. Jose W. Fernandez, partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, presided.

In this clip, O’Neil discusses how the arrival of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan refugees has affected security and politics in neighboring Colombia. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

Business and Foreign Policy: Robert A. Iger

On April 12, CFR welcomed Robert A. Iger, chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company, who spoke on a range of topics, including Saudi Arabia, climate change, and the evolving job market. The event was part of the Bernard L. Schwartz Lecture series, which focuses on the relationship between business and government in the making of foreign policy. CFR’s Haass presided.

In this clip, Iger discusses Disney’s decision to support the Paris Agreement on climate and its support for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), an Obama-era immigration program.

View the full event video and read the transcript here.

U.S.-Iran Relations: Mohammad Javad Zarif

On April 23, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s minister of foreign affairs, discussed relations with the United States, the Iran nuclear deal, and Middle East politics. Stephen J. Hadley, former U.S. national security advisor and CFR board member, presided.

In this clip, Zarif explains why Iran and Saudi Arabia, in their competition for hegemony in the Middle East, “have managed to destroy the region.” View the full event video and read the transcript here.

Lessons of the Financial Crisis: Bernanke, Geithner, and Paulson

On September 24, CFR hosted the Stephen C. Freidheim Symposium on Global Economics: The Legacy of the Global Financial Crisis. The keynote panel featured three officials at the center of the U.S. government’s response to the 2008 financial crisis: former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, former Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., and former New York Fed Chairman and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner. The event was moderated by Ruth Porat, chief financial officer of Alphabet and Google.

In this clip, Porat asks each panelist to describe his “most terrifying moment of the crisis.” View the full event video and read the transcript here.

U.S.-Canada Relations: Trudeau, Freeland, and Carr

On September 25, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland, and International Trade Diversification Minister Jim Carr spoke at CFR as part of the Russell C. Leffingwell Lecture series. They discussed the future of multilateralism, economic growth, and gender equality. CFR’s Haass presided.

In this clip, Trudeau discusses the Trump administration’s decision to label Canada a national security threat and impose tariffs. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

The Artificial Intelligence Race: Kai-Fu Lee

On October 5, CFR hosted Kai-Fu Lee, chairman and CEO of Sinovation Ventures and former head of Google China. Lee spoke with Deven J. Parekh, managing director of Insight Venture Partners, about advances in artificial intelligence, the future of work, and the technology race between the United States and China. Part of an annual lecture series, the event was sponsored by Malcolm and Carolyn Wiener.

In this clip, Lee discusses the rapidly evolving culture of entrepreneurship in China. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

The Empty Throne: America's Abdication of Global Leadership

On October 22, CFR’s James M. Lindsay and Ivo H. Daalder, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, discussed their new book, The Empty Throne: America’s Abdication of Global Leadership. The coauthors spoke with NPR’s Mara Liasson about the Trump administration, U.S.-Saudi Arabia relations, and global power competition.

In this clip, Lindsay discusses the fraying of the rules-based order and ways to repair it. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

U.S. Homeland Security: Kirstjen Nielsen

On November 2, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen spoke at CFR about safeguarding U.S. elections and securing the border. Jerry Seib, Washington bureau chief of the Wall Street Journal, presided.

In this clip, Nielsen answers a question about the separation of migrant families. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

Women and the Global Economy: Christine Lagarde

On December 12, CFR hosted Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, for a conversation with McKinsey Global Institute’s James Manyika about the economic implications of gender inequality. The meeting was the keynote session of a symposium on women and the law that also featured World Bank CEO Kristalina Georgieva.

In this clip, Largarde describes legal barriers that prevent women from fully participating in their economies. View the full event video and read the transcript here.

Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.

View License Detail

Explore More on United States

United States

What Is the Defense Production Act?

Presidents Trump and Biden have turned to the Defense Production Act to address the country’s vital needs, from stimulating critical supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic to countering growing competition with China. How does the law work?

by Anshu Siripurapu May 22, 2025

Sanctions

Three Years of War in Ukraine: Are Sanctions Against Russia Making a Difference?

The United States and its allies have imposed broad economic penalties on Russia over its war in Ukraine. As the conflict continues, experts debate whether the sanctions are working.

by CFR.org Editors May 21, 2025

Refugees and Displaced Persons

How Does the U.S. Refugee System Work?

The United States has long been considered a safe haven for refugees from around the world, but this could change following the Trump administration’s decision to suspend the country’s decades-old refugee resettlement program.

by Diana Roy, Claire Klobucista and James McBride May 16, 2025

Top Stories on CFR

Trade

Trump’s New Aluminum and Steel Tariffs Explained in Six Charts

President Trump doubled almost all aluminum and steel import tariffs, seeking to curb China’s growing dominance in global trade. These six charts show the tariffs’ potential economic effects.

by Shannon K. O'Neil and Julia Huesa June 5, 2025 Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

Ukraine

The Senate’s New Ukraine Bill Will Not Work—But Here Is How to Fix It

The Sanctioning Russia Act would impose history’s highest tariffs and tank the global economy. Congress needs a better approach, one that strengthens existing sanctions and adds new measures the current bill ignores.

by Stephen Sestanovich June 4, 2025 Wachenheim Program on Peace and Security

China Strategy Initiative

Divergence Despite Convergence: The United States-India Strategic Partnership and Defense Norms

At the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore last week, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said that the United States would be expanding its defense partnership with India. His statement was in line with U.S. policy over the last two decades, which, irrespective of the party in power, has sought to cultivate India as a serious defense partner. The U.S.-India defense partnership has come a long way. Beginning in 2001, the United States and India moved from little defense cooperation or coordination to significant gestures that would lay the foundation of the robust defense partnership that exists today—such as India offering access to its facilities after 9/11 to help the United States launch operations in Afghanistan or the 123 Agreement in 2005 that paved the way for civil nuclear cooperation between the two countries. In the United States, there is bipartisan agreement that a strong defense partnership with India is vital for its Indo-Pacific strategy and containing China. In India, too, there is broad political support for its strategic partnership with the United States given its immense wariness about its fractious border relationship with China. Consequently, the U.S.-India bilateral relationship has heavily emphasized security, with even trade tilting toward defense goods. Despite the massive changes to the relationship in the last few years, and both countries’ desire to develop ever-closer defense ties, differences between the United States and India remain. A significant part of this has to do with the differing norms that underpin the defense interests of each country. The following Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) memos by defense experts in three countries are part of a larger CFR project assessing India’s approach to the international order in different areas, and illustrate India’s positions on important defense issues—military operationalization, cooperation in space, and export controls—and how they differ with respect to the United States and its allies. Sameer Lalwani (Washington, DC) argues that the two countries differ in their thinking about deterrence, and that this is evident in three categories crucial to defense: capability, geography, and interoperability. When it comes to increasing material capabilities, for example, India prioritizes domestic economic development, including developing indigenous capabilities (i.e., its domestic defense-industrial sector). With regard to geography, for example, the United States and its Western allies think of crises, such as Ukraine, in terms of global domino effects; India, in contrast, thinks regionally, and confines itself to the effects on its neighborhood and borders (and, as the recent crisis with Pakistan shows, India continues to face threats on its border, widening the geographic divergence with the United States). And India’s commitment to strategic autonomy means the two countries remain far apart on the kind of interoperability required by modern military operations. Yet there is also reason for optimism about the relationship as those differences are largely surmountable. Dimitrios Stroikos (London) argues that India’s space policy has shifted from prioritizing socioeconomic development to pursuing both national security and prestige. While it is party to all five UN space treaties that govern outer space and converges with the United States on many issues in the civil, commercial, and military domains of space, India is careful with regard to some norms. It favors, for example, bilateral initiatives over multilateral, and the inclusion of Global South countries in institutions that it believes to be dominated by the West. Konark Bhandari (New Delhi) argues that India’s stance on export controls is evolving. It has signed three of the four major international export control regimes, but it has to consistently contend with the cost of complying, particularly as the United States is increasingly and unilaterally imposing export control measures both inside and outside of those regimes. When it comes to export controls, India prefers trade agreements with select nations, prizes its strategic autonomy (which includes relations with Russia and China through institutions such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the BRICS), and prioritizes its domestic development. Furthermore, given President Donald Trump’s focus on bilateral trade, the two countries’ differences will need to be worked out if future tech cooperation is to be realized.

by Manjari Chatterjee Miller June 5, 2025 China Strategy Initiative